Zach’s Zany Movie Reviews: AD ASTRA (no spoilers)

While I don’t think AD ASTRA is a masterpiece like some are saying it is, I really, really liked it, and in some parts I even felt love. It is going to be a little hard and a little weird to explain my feelings with this movie, but I hope you can bear with me in my next couple of zany paragraphs. Because, even with the most stupid, inane, and inept space films out there, I always manage to get something out of them. I really do enjoy science fiction films, especially when they give me a sense of claustrophobia without feeling claustrophobic. See? Told you I wouldn’t make any sense with this one. But from the opening scenes to the end credits, I was perfectly enthralled with this, entertained and enjoyed almost every minute of it. There are some glaring faults that prevent me from considering this a true space/science fiction masterpiece, but the movie had a precise narrative flow to it even though some of the subtext and themes get a little lost (or a little too found) in translation.

Even though I would consider this one of the more realistic space/science fiction films in recent memory (especially Interstellar, I mean, come on…that ending), Ad Astra I feel borrows from one too many films to be its own completely unique creation. It’s basically parts Interstellar, parts Apocalypse Now/Heart Of Darkness, parts Alien, parts 2001 A Space Odyssey, parts The Martian, parts Contact all rolled into one adventure that contains heaps of daddy issues. Brad Pitt though is once again excellent as an astronaut given a classified mission after a giant energy surge catastrophe on Earth kills people in the tens of thousands. It turns out this surge’s origin might’ve been on a top secret government/NASA project near Neptune that has been going on for almost three decades the leader of which, is Pitt’s father, played by Tommy Lee Jones. The government sends Brad Pitt to Mars to send a message to his dad to see if their project, which includes searching for extra terrestrial life, is indeed the cause of the incident and could end up eventually destroying all life in the galaxy. But as Pitt goes along in his mission, there is of course more to it than meets the eye, as Pitt struggles with his priorities of seeing/speaking his father again after twenty some odd years, and potentially saving the universe.

From my description, you can probably piece together where all those themes and context from all those different films I listed come into play. Well, maybe except a little for Alien, you’ll get what I mean after you get freaked out with a fantastic tension filled small horror sequence the movie has to offer. The film does feel unique, although it just feels a little too familiar to say it is the “end all be all of space epics.” But I would happily revisit this film again and again, that’s how much it has stuck with me since leaving the theater. The special effects in this film are incredible, with several sequences dazzling my eyes to the tune of wonderment. Specifically, there is a sequence at the beginning with Pitt on a giant space satellite needle that was very vertigo inducing, and there is also a sort of pirate chase sequence involving rovers on the surface of the moon near the beginning of the second act that was pretty stunning to experience. All of the science as well seemed to have added up, except for one sequence near the very end of the film that involves propelling off something while also using a small part of a space station as a shield (you’ll know it when you see it).

The main issue I feel that people are going to have with this movie are the themes and context of it all. For a large part of the movie, the filmmakers spoon feed all of what is happening on screen to audience members that they don’t think would “get it.” Give us credit, we are smarter than we look. Some of this spoon fed stuff comes in the form of Brad Pitt’s narration, which, even though he didn’t seem like he was phoning it in, like the original theatrical cut of Blade Runner, I felt was completely unnecessary. We could’ve figured out everything the film was meaning to tell us on our own, without the narration. The visuals are key in this and were more than enough to clue us in. Another problem is mainly with the daddy issues thing that controls basically the whole narrative. It’s not that the payoff is disappointing, it is that none of the set ups make the ending truly satisfying. It is hard to explain much without going into true spoilers, but the beginning of the film makes it as though Pitt is following his fathers footsteps at being disconnected too much with society. I got that, but I didn’t feel as if that notion were earned. The movie clocks in at around two hours, but to make it a tight film, I feel like they needed to maybe add one or two more scenes with Pitt and Liv Tyler, along with completely taking out the narration.

This is Pitt’s movie, with everyone playing a far, far, far, far second fiddle. Tommy Lee Jones is in it a little, and is good at the parts he is in. That’s all I’ll say on that front. Ruth Negga is also in a couple of scenes, and I enjoyed her presence as well. The ‘and’ in the credits and on the poster is Donald Sutherland and he sort of earns that title, being in the film for only a handful of scenes (good in this as well). I thought his arc would end much earlier than it ended up. The person who is really short changed is Liv Tyler. She’s probably in the film for about 2-3 minutes total, and it is all mostly flashbacks or quick ‘blink or you miss her’ visual cuts. Even though she’s playing basically the same role that she had in Armageddon (staying on Earth while her love is out in space), I think she has matured as an actress (see: The Leftovers) where I would’ve liked to see her blossom a little bit with more of an on-screen role. It honestly could’ve been an unknown playing her character and it wouldn’t have made a lick of difference in this case.

And while others are complaining that all the subtext, context, what have you, is all easily displayed on screen, with nothing left to make you think, I for one don’t think that is necessarily true. Again, not to get into spoilers, but I picked some things out of my viewing that I don’t think others would likely get unless the he/she viewed the film several more times. I saw a couple of hidden themes and such that when put together with the rest of the movie, told a more layered and complex narrative than initial believed. I don’t want to go into spoilers, and saying what I think would be doing so, so if you see this and want to discuss, I am available as I would like to see what you gathered from this film as well. See if our minds connected somehow.

Anyway, I really liked this film a lot. Loved some sequences. Yes, I wish it were tighter so it would’ve been a unique masterpiece, but just glad it wasn’t a disaster and that it entertained me the entire time and kept my attention. It really is a beautiful film. Beautifully claustrophobic if that makes any sense to you. This is easily writer/director James Gray’s best film, although I don’t know if that is saying much, considering I only really like this and his last film The Lost City of Z, out of his filmography (never saw The Yards). It really didn’t make all that much in the theater this past weekend, but I have a feeling more people will discover it on video. I mean come on people, it’s Brad Pitt, he usually pics and chooses his projects pretty well. I would definitely recommend you take this visit “to the stars.” (what the term Ad Astra actually means)

Zach’s Zany Movie Reviews: ONCE UPON A TIME…IN HOLLYWOOD (no spoilers)

I have a word of warning for all you would be review reading warriors: you are going to either love ONCE UPON A TIME…IN HOLLYWOOD or your going to be underwhelmed. And that depends on what kind of a movie watcher you are. Are you like me, and like to dig so deep into a film that you can debate all of its contents for days and years to come. If you are, congrats, you will probably love this movie like I did. Or are you a….casual moviegoer? Do you go for the plot/story and really only look at movies on a surface level, not digging deep as to why a film truly might be a masterpiece? If you are one of those, sorry to say, you will be underwhelmed. For me, Once Upon A Time…In Hollywood is easily the best film of 2019 so far. That’s right, even better than John Wick Chapter 3 right now. Call me Tarantino biased all you want, when I was watching this film, Quentin sucked me into his fairy tale where I started seeing every frame for what it was truly meant to represent. This film is true artistry.

If I had to call this film anything, it is a film about film making and film careers in general, while spinning it into true events, while also being a comedy buddy hangout film with some minor horror elements near the end. That’s a giant mouthful right? Well, the tone completely works. Imagine if Quentin Tarantino re wrote and re made American Graffiti but set it to the film industry around the time of the Manson Murders, and you can maybe see what you’d get. Some of you will come out of this movie saying: this movie hardly had any plot, it was just different scenes of people going to and from work and other places and they were just talking about their careers the entire time or filming a TV show. Well, you are just looking at the surface level of the story. The surface level of the story is that an actor named Rick Dalton (Leonardo DiCaprio) and his stunt double named Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt) navigate a Hollywood industry and try to stay relevant during the final years of Hollywood’s Golden Age in 1969 Los Angeles. Oh, and Rick happens to live next door to Roman Polanski and Sharon Tate (played by Margot Robbie).

Before seeing this movie, I would really encourage you to look up Sharon Tate and see what happened to her via Charles Manson and the Manson Family. It’s really horrific and might give you nightmares for days, but knowing her life and what the Manson family was up to will help you dig deeper into the philosophical aspects of the story/film. The movie isn’t just a couple of layers, I have a feeling that Tarantino has an infinite amounts of points of view on how you are supposed to appreciate and look at this film. After watching it, it is definitely a Quentin Tarantino movie, but then again it isn’t. It’s aspects pulled from everything that he’s done before, but maybe not so much of that over-the-top gritty unique dialogue that you’ve been accustomed to getting. Some of it is still there though. But that’s okay, because I have a feeling that bombastic dialogue might not have went as well with this film as it has some of his others.

Let’s dig quickly into the two controversies in the film without spoiling anything of what happens: that Margot Robbie is only in a handful of scenes and doesn’t get that much dialogue, and the really, really violent last act. I can completely see why Margot Robbie doesn’t have that much to do in the film. As Tarantino has said, he didn’t want to paint her as a victim of what happened to her, he wanted to show that she was an ordinary person like you and I caught up in the glitz and glam of Hollywood. The scene that I’m sure you’ve seen in the trailers of her watching herself in the real film The Wrecking Crew and getting so happy by the positive audience reaction in the theater is an amazing scene that Margot Robbie pulls off masterfully just based on her facial expressions. Her having a lot more scenes and a lot more dialogue I think would’ve hindered the impact of the ending and made her sort of a false representation of Tate. What Tarantino did with her character is perfect and I stand by that. I won’t get into any details, but the violent last act is perfect. It pays homage to films that will eventually be made in the upcoming decade of the 70s while also showing and visually explaining why that true life event would change everything in Hollywood industry forever, a true loss of innocence. That’s all I’m saying to not ruin anything, but I LOVED LOVED LOVED what the ending brought to the film.

I don’t need to tell you that the other aspects of the film are perfect. Tarantino made 1969 Hollywood alive again. The cinematography needs to win an Oscar here. The direction and dialogue are crisp, clean, and masterful as always from Quentin. But let’s get to the acting. Leonardo DiCaprio and Brad Pitt, two of the biggest movie stars in the world, display some of their best acting here, with both of them sure to get nods for leading and supporting, and Pitt to probably just take the trophy home early next year. They are the perfect comedy buddy pair, and I would love to see them do something else together, although drastically different. Leonardo commands the first half of the film, while Brad Pitt mostly shines in the climax and on his character’s visit to Spahn movie ranch. And while Margot Robbie is fantastic with the handful of scenes she is in, I think she is overshadowed by Margaret Qualley, who plays Pussycat, a Charlies Manson follower. Their scene in the car heading to Spahn Ranch is pitch perfect with every aspect of movie making you can think of.

Unlike Tarantino films, I don’t want this review to be too long. I could honestly talk for hours about it. I could talk about Rick Dalton’s scene with the method acting little girl, or the great scene of Dalton talking to Pacino’s character about his older stuff and that he possibly has a career in doing Spaghetti Westerns, or what goes down in Cliff Booth’s visit to Spahn Ranch all the live long day. But I won’t. If you’d like to discuss those scenes, I’m just a text, call, or Facebook messenger away. I would love to talk this movie with you, because I am going to be singing its praises for awhile, probably until Tarantino makes his 10th and Final Film. I’m going to rank his writing and directing gigs below this, and while this might seem like it is in the middle to you (it’s exactly in the middle right now), just know that I don’t think Tarantino has ever made a bad film, maybe just an underwhelming one with Death Proof. The rest all have a little bit or a shit ton of my love. I loved taking a trip to Hollywood in Once Upon A Time…In Hollywood. I think that if you gave this film the chance and the proper magnifying class, you could too.

My Ranking of Quentin Tarantino Films (only ones that he both wrote and directed):

  1. Pulp Fiction
  2. Inglourious Basterds
  3. Django Unchained
  4. Kill Bill (both volumes are one movie)
  5. Once Upon A Time…In Hollywood
  6. Jackie Brown
  7. Reservoir Dogs
  8. The Hateful Eight
  9. Death Proof